Guidelines
for Hormone
Implantation
The simple technique described by Thom and Studd
in 1980 (1) should be used which is a clinic procedure under local
anaesthetic using a small 5 mm incision and no suture. The trocar
should be inserted to its full length into the fat of the abdominal
wall or upper outer quadrant of the buttock. The muscle and old
surgical scars must be avoided as this causes pain and bleeding.
As the testosterone pellet is occasionally rejected, this should
be inserted after (i.e. on top of) the oestradiol pellet. The procedure
is usually repeated every six months.
Oestradiol implants can be used in 25 mg, 50 mg
and 75 mg doses. 100 mg dose should never be used as the initial
starting dose. Testosterone can be added and is available as 25
mg, 50 mg and 100 mg pellets.
Indications for use
Implants are, for many women, a very convenient way of taking HRT.
There is better continuation with good symptomatic improvement due
to the higher plasma oestradiol levels obtained than from oral preparations.
It is particularly convenient for women after hysterectomy and for
those women who have also had bilateral oophorectomy and need testosterone.
Implants of oestradiol 50 mg and testosterone 100 mg are the most
effective method for these patients and a 10-year continuation rate
of more than 85% can be achieved.
Women with hormone responsive depression, loss
of libido, loss of energy, loss of bone density and an inadequate
response to oral oestrogens should be considered for implant therapy
even though they may still have a uterus.
As the incremental increase in bone density is
proportional to the plasma oestradiol level obtained after hormone
therapy, oestradiol implants are the most effective way of increasing
bone density. This is particularly true in older women with low
bone density and the lowest dose of oestradiol ie 25 mg, should
be used. The increase in the lumbar spine bone density of the younger
postmenopausal woman after one year is 4% with a 25 mg implant,
5% with 50 mgs and 7% with the 75 mg oestradiol implant. The mean
plasma oestradiol levels for these doses at one year is 320 pmol/l,
360 pmol/l and 520 pmol/l respectively.(2)
It is usual for the climacteric symptoms to improve
within two weeks and to begin to return at approximately five months
although in some patients the symptoms may return as early as three
months or as late as eighteen months after the last implantation.
The relationship of plasma oestradiol levels and
symptoms is complex. There is good evidence that a plasma oestradiol
level of 300 pmol/l is necessary to ensure the improvement of bone
density in nearly all women.(2) There is also evidence that plasma
oestradiol levels of 800 pmol/l may be necessary for the improvement
of depression in the climacteric woman or in pre-menstrual depression
or in post-natal depression.(3) It is in these depressed patients
that we can justify using the higher starting dose of 75 mg of oestradiol.
All patients with a uterus must of course have
the protection of a progestogen. This can be done by oral progestogen
for the first 10 or 12 days of each calendar month or by the insertion
of a Mirena coil. The combination of oestradiol implants with or
without testosterone together with a Mirena coil is a good regimen
for women with hormone responsive depression and in those women
with a history of unsatisfactory oral transdermal therapy that may
have been complicated by the PMS type symptoms of progestogen intolerance.
Routine Surveillance
Mammography should be performed according to National
Guidelines although some patients may wish to have more frequent
reassurance. A transvaginal ultrasound scan of the pelvis should
be performed if and when indicated.
There is no reason for routine plasma oestradiol
measurements before a reimplantation if the patient is on an appropriate
dose and the intervals between reimplantation are not less than
6 months. Conversely, if patients come back for repeat implants
more frequently than every 5 months, or are having repeated implants
of more than 50 mgs, the plasma oestradiol should be measured because
the clinical response is inappropriate. Similarly, if apparently
oestrogen responsive symptoms are not suppressed there will be a
need for measurement of plasma oestradiol levels. In these cases,
oestradiol levels should be measure every year but it is not necessary
to make these measurements before each implant.
Tachyphylaxis
Too frequent implantation or too high doses of
oestrogen leads to supra-physiological oestradiol levels and the
recurrence of symptoms even at these high levels.(4) It is not easy
to treat and it must be said that the secret is to avoid it happening
by using the correct dose of hormones in the first place. The normal
range of plasma oestradiol during the ovarian cycle is between 100-1500
pmol/l but plasma oestradiol levels greatly exceeding these values
can be found in patients with tachyphylaxis.
The symptoms that these women suffer are real,
not imaginary although they are not always typical menopausal symptoms.(5)
In fact many of these women have a history of psychological disorders.(6)
Because of this potential problem, the implants should be used with
caution in women with a known history of chronic anxiety or stress
disorders. The recurrence of apparently oestrogen deficiency symptoms
at these levels are no doubt due to the change of oestradiol levels
from "very high" to "high" and they become accustomed to a higher
threshold. These high levels may be unnecessary and avoidable but
sometimes women with convincing oestrogen responsive depression
need even higher oestradiol levels but there is little or no evidence
that they are harmful.
There would rarely be an indication for repeat
implant if the oestradiol levels are above 1000 pmol but sometimes
women with convincing oestrogen responsive depression need even
higher oestradiol levels and a repeat implant should not, after
very careful consideration, be prohibited.(3) It is wrong to
deny women further oestrogen therapy thus making them suffer many
months or years of symptoms, particularly depression, anxiety and
loss of energy. They can be given a low dose oestradiol implant
of 25 mg usually with testosterone 100 mg, with explanation that
this must last for six months. Alternatively this period can be
covered by patches, gel or oral therapy. The oestradiol levels will
fall to more acceptable levels within one or two years without the
patient suffering greatly from oestrogen deficiency symptoms.(7)
The "cold turkey" treatment is not acceptable as profound depression
is very common in these patients denied further oestrogen therapy.
Prolonged duration of implants
Although symptoms return at six months, the implant
is usually still active and producing pre-menopausal hormone levels
up to two years after the last implant. This may be seen as a huge
advantage and no doubt is responsible for the usual beneficial effect
upon wellbeing and bone density. It can also be a disadvantage for
women who change their mind and want to discontinue implants and
bleeding. They need progestogen courses for about two years after
the implant or until the progestogen no longer produces a withdrawal
bleed. The increasing use of the Mirena intra-uterine system has
solved many of these problems, although it is not yet licensed for
this indication. The patient should be warned that this is a potential
problem.
If response to therapy is considered, oestrogen
implants are the most efficient way of delivering oestrogens. This
does not mean they are necessarily first choice or the best treatment
for an individual patient but this route does have a particular
place in women after hysterectomy, women with libido problems or
depression or women with severe osteoporosis and those who have
suffered side-effects with oral therapy.
1.(1) Thom, M., Studd, JWW., (1980) Procedures
in Practice:Hormone Implantation. Brit. M. J. I, 648-50.
2.Studd, J., Holland, EPN., Leather A., Smith, R. (1994) The dose-response
of percutaneous oestradiol implants on the skeletons of postmenopausal
women. BJOG 101, 7878-791
3.Panay N, Studd, J W, The Psychotherapeutic effects of oestrogens
Gynaecol, endocrinol, 1998, 12, 353-65.
4.Ganger K, Whitehead M I. Hormone implants and tachyphylaxis. BritishJ
Obstets Gynaecol 1991 - 98 - 607-9.
5.Brincat M, Magos A, Studd J W, Cardozo L D Subcutaneous Hormone
Implants for the Control of Climacteric Symptoms. A prospective
study.
6.Pearce, J., Horton, K., Blake, F., Barlow DH. (1997) Psychological
effect of continuation versus discontinuation of HRT by oestrogen
implants; a placebo-controlled study. J. Psychosomat. Res. 42,177-186.
7.Garnett, T., Studd, JWW, Henderson, AF., Watson, NR., Savvas,
M., Leather, A. (1990) Hormone implants and tachyphylaxis. BJOG
97,917-921
Click
here for an article on Pre Menstrual Syndrome »
|